This site is being archived soon. Visit wesnet.org.au for more information.

About AWAVA Secretariat

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far AWAVA Secretariat has created 504 blog entries.

Self-Isolation Means Many Women Will Be Trapped With Their Abuser

This article by AWAVA’s Program Manager Dr Merrindahl Andrew was originally published by With Her In Mind and can be viewed here. For more detail about the support AWAVA is requesting from the Federal Government read our post here. 

 

As self-isolation becomes the norm, Dr Merrindahl Andrew, Program Manager for Australian Women Against Violence Alliance, highlights how this will leave may women and children in danger.

 

In a time where staying at home is the best way to limit the spread of COVID-19, we need to remember that for many women and children that will mean being self-isolated at home with their abuser.

 

Home should always be a safe place. Unfortunately, for people being subjected to violence and abuse by a partner or family member, it’s not.

 

All the evidence tells us that as the COVID-19 pandemic continues, more women and children will face increasing threats to their safety, as abusers’ use of violence escalates with increased isolation, stress and lack of community accountability – a pattern we know from natural disasters in Australia and worldwide.

 

People who choose to use violence against their partners and family members often have a pattern of abuse. This typically involves coercion, surveillance and cutting off their partner’s relationships with co-workers, friends and family. Isolation due to COVID-19 will intensify this kind of coercive control by abusers.


‘Please don’t use coronavirus as an excuse to be racist’ and how keep on top of your mental health while in self-isolation.

 

As more people get sick and people need to isolate in their homes, more and more are going to be cut off from their usual avenues of support. Many women will lack the breathing space they need to make safety plans, and as the financial impact of the pandemic takes effect, access to the money needed to build a new life of safety may be even more limited.

 

That’s why it is vital that governments’ plans to respond to COVID-19 include urgent measures for women’s safety and resourcing of services.

 

From overseas reports and experience with other disasters, we expect abusers will use the COVID-19 pandemic as another opportunity to exert control – for example by limiting access to medical care or threatening to expose someone to the virus. Already, women with disabilities find that abusers threaten and withhold access to the equipment and services they need to function in a world that is often inaccessible. In the situation created by COVID-19, women with disabilities will be even more at risk of violence, and will need extra support. More generally, this health crisis will intensify pre-existing inequalities.

 

People already battling poverty, discrimination or insecure migration status will find their ability to seek safety further impeded by the COVID-19 crisis, especially where they already lack access to basic services and income.

 

Even before this crisis increases demand, we know that every day many women reaching out for help from services aren’t able to get it because of government funding decisions. We cannot allow this government neglect to continue, when the consequences of leaving women and children without support are even more life-threatening.

 

As with all other sectors of society, COVID-19 complicates the work of supporting women’s safety. And like all the services that work for the wellbeing and safety of our community, specialist family violence workers are using their expertise to find the best ways of providing support. In order to do this, they need additional resources.

 

As women become more physically isolated, their safety and support needs will increasingly have to be met remotely, by phone and online. Access to secure phones is vital – which is why the government must urgently fund WESNET’s Safe Connections program to continue providing safe phones and tech advice to women facing domestic and family violence and their front-line workers. More broadly women need the social security, health, reproductive, legal and migration services that they can use to build the lives they want without being controlled or threatened.

 

Key gaps need urgent attention. Increasing Centrelink payments is important and welcome, but this should include disability, youth and student payments. Women experiencing violence need access to Medicare, income support and other services regardless of migration status. Police need to prioritise protection orders and enable women and children to stay in the family home while removing perpetrators where it is safe to do so.

 

Women’s and children’s safety must be prioritised as an integral part of the pandemic response, and that means immediately increasing funding to specialist services and communicating to the public that everyone has the right to be safe in their home.

 

Across Australia we have specialists with decades of experience working in challenging circumstances to make it safe for women to be in their own homes. We stand ready to work with governments to make women safer now.

 


If you or another person is in immediate danger, please phone 000. For counselling about family or domestic violence or sexual assault contact 1800RESPECT online or by phoning 1800 737 732. For men who might be concerned about using violence, call the Men’s Referral Service on 1300 766 491.


Everyone who cares about this issue should be urging their governments to make sure people facing abuse in their home can access the service support they need to be safe, which you can do here.


Dr Merrindahl Andrew is the Program Manager for Australian Women Against Violence Alliance.

 

Submission in response to the discussion paper ‘Human Rights and Technology’

In this submission we articulate our support for the views of the Commission on the importance of taking a human-rights approach to technology with freedom from technology-facilitated violence, harassment and exploitation at its core.

Technology-facilitated abuse in its all manifestations is driven by an intention to harass, stalk, groom, monitor, conduct surveillance on, location-track, threaten, humiliate, impersonate and/or isolate a person. In gender-based violence against women, it can be understood as another tool used by perpetrators to hold power and control over a victim/survivor. Sexual and gender-based violence against women is a gross violation of human rights in all its manifestations.

Download our submission here

 

Submission on the Retirement Income Review

AWAVA has made a submission to the Retirement income review.

In this submission we wish to draw the attention to the structural barriers that impact diverse groups of women to establish their financial independence and stability, impacts of feminisation of poverty and impacts of domestic and family violence. We argue that without embedding an intersectional gender lens in social policy, equitable outcomes for women in their diversity will not be achieved.

Download our submission here

 

Women’s lives will be at risk because of decision not to act today – domestic violence experts

For immediate release 

13 March 2020

 

Key women’s safety advocates have denounced the woeful outcomes from today’s COAG meeting in relation to women’s and children’s safety. 

 

The groups say that the lack of action coming out of today’s COAG meeting shows an absence of leadership; and a decision to abandon the women and children whose safety would be improved by the 5 expert-backed actions.

 

Last week, the Australian Women Against Violence Alliance and women’s rights campaigning movement Fair Agenda, alongside 84 groups working for women’s safety – sent a joint letter to all governments outlining five key changes they need to make to dramatically improve women’s safety. Those actions were:

  1. Fully funding the specialist services women and children rely on to be safe.
  2. Putting children’s safety first in the family law system. 
  3. Identify women and children at immediate risk 
  4. Improving AVO standards to hold perpetrators accountable and interrupt their escalating violence
  5. Ensuring everyone’s calls for help can be heard.

 

“Heads of government have left this meeting having done nothing to address the urgent safety issues experts have laid out; and which contribute to one woman’s future and life being stolen from her every single week. The women and children in danger right now deserve better than this weak commitment to more discussions about possible action in the future.” – Dr Merrindahl Andrew, Program Manager,  Australian Women Against Violence Alliance.

 

“Responsibility for implementing most of these 5 desperately needed changes sits with the federal government, so Prime Minister Morrison’s lack of leadership is particularly disappointing.” Renee Carr, Executive Director, Fair Agenda. 

 

“The Prime Minister  told parliament all of us need to reflect on how and where the system failed Hannah and her children. Experts have since told his government five key areas where the systems are failing women and children at risk, and that he could fix immediately – and today he’s ignored that advice.” – added Ms Carr.

 

Instead, coming out of today’s meeting COAG has committed to no immediate action. Their only commitments are promises of further discussion: including creating a new COAG council, and working to “understand the current status” of crisis accommodation and housing support.

 

“The women at risk right now deserve immediate changes that can help make them and their children safer. Experts laid out five immediate interventions that governments could have, and should have, locked in today. Those changes would have improved women’s safety within weeks. Instead, with each passing day the government delays these desperately needed actions, women in incredible danger will be turned away from services; forced by courts to deliver their children to a parent who is a known safety risk to them; and unable to access basic interpreting services so their calls for help can be understood.” Ms Carr. 

 

“We have a broken Family Law system that is placing kids with violent parents. Actually forcing them to spend time with them. We have women reaching out for help, and having to be left unassisted, because governments are making decisions they know will lead to women being turned away. We have men using violence, being turned away from services that are supposed to help them change their behaviour.” Dr Merrindahl Andrew added.

 

“The excuse that governments need more information about service gaps before taking action is absurd. We know that every day 63 women in NSW alone are reaching out for help; but unable to get access to the safe at home programs that are best placed to improve their safety. We know Family Violence Prevention Legal Services have to turn away 30-40% of people contacting them for support. We know that a program that helps 600 women a month access safe technology is about to be cut. This isn’t a question of information, it’s a question of priorities.” said Hayley Foster, Women’s Safety NSW.

 

“Major investment is needed to ensure women aren’t left on their own to escape an abuser who is trying to stalk, harass and punish them. Today’s decision will leave many, many women at risk.” Ms Foster added.

 

“We still have federal laws in operation that mean every day kids are forced into care arrangements with parents where there are real concerns of violence and abuse.” – added Ms Lynch.

 

“Government’s can’t just focus on either prevention or response. They need to do both.” – Dr Andrew added.

 

“We need governments to commit to the comprehensive reform needed for women’s safety in the long-term. But there are women and children at risk right now, who can’t wait for  future action. They need these five changes we know can improve their safety immediately.” – Dr Andrew concluded.

 

“Prevention is incredibly important but we also need the urgent, additional and sustained funding that experts have been calling for for years. Preventing violence in the future takes not just changing attitudes; but also fixing the systems that keep women and children unsafe.” added Joanne Yates, CEO of Domestic Violence NSW.

Submission to the Joint Select Committee on Australia’s Family Law System

AWAVA has made a submission to the Joint Select Committee on Australia’s Family Law System.

AWAVA’s position has always been consistent that the redevelopment of the family law system should be underpinned by the following principles:
1. Safety for victims/survivors and their children;
2. Accessibility of the system;
3. Fairness and responsiveness; and
4. Recognition of diversity.

We strongly believe that the principle of safety and wellbeing for victims/survivors of violence and children should be a paramount consideration in any reforms to the family law system.

Download our submission here  

Letter to Women’s Safety Ministers on urgent actions for women’s safety

5 March 2020

 

Dear Women’s Safety Ministers,
As specialists with years of experience working with and for women and children subjected to violence, we know that long-term, major reforms are needed over the coming months and years to achieve lasting improvements to safety and justice.

 

We also know there are key changes your governments can make immediately that will dramatically improve the safety of many women and children within weeks.

 

As well as committing to comprehensive reform to prevent all forms of violence against women, we urge you to action these five desperately needed changes at your meeting on Friday:

 

1. Fully fund the specialist services that improve women’s safety, and hold men who use violence to account, including:

    • The safety planning, risk assessment and wrap-around individual support provided by specialist women’s services,
    • The safe at home programs and emergency accommodation services provided by specialist homelessness providers working specifically with victim-survivors of violence,
    • The legal assistance and representation provided by specialist women’s legal services, Family Violence Prevention Legal Services, community legal centres, Aboriginal legal services, and Legal Aid,
    • The perpetrator intervention, men’s behaviour change programs and fathering programs provided by accredited men’s behaviour change experts,
    • The specialist and culturally-safe services that are best able to assist Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and women from migrant and refugee backgrounds,
    • The disability advocacy and domestic violence services needed to support women with disabilities to overcome the barriers to achieving safety after violence from a partner, carer or in an institutional setting,
    • The safe phones program, which has been found be effective in delivering victims/survivors greater technology safety,
    • LGBTIQ+ services and LGBTIQ+-specific resources, programs and targeted community education campaigns,
    • Supporting community-based services to lead the conversations needed to change the attitudes and behaviours that enable violence, including empowering bystanders.

 

2. Remove the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility and emphasis on shared parenting in the Family Law Act 1975, to ensure a child’s safety and wellbeing are the key considerations, so that courts are determining the best parenting arrangement for their needs and circumstances.

3. Initiate a standard screening, risk assessment and referral process nationally, to ensure public health, social and community services are trained to identify key safety risks early for people experiencing violence in their relationships, and able to refer them to the services that can help them achieve safety and recover.

4. Agree to institute improved AVO standards to make clear what is expected of police, magistrates and courts to hold perpetrators accountable, and ensure women and children subjected to domestic and family violence are able to rely on these orders to achieve safety and justice.

5. Ensure victims/survivors seeking help can access free translating and interpreting services, so that regardless of their disability, cultural or language background, or geographical location, any woman reaching out for help to build a safer future is able to access the assistance she needs.

 

As with all initiatives for improved community safety and wellbeing, these urgent steps must be taken in a way that responds to the factors that shape people’s experiences of violence and encounters with institutions. These can include: the ongoing impacts of colonisation, race, class, sexual orientation and gender identity, ethnicity, nationality, religion, dis/ability and age, as well as the community attitudes, geographical isolation and the poor connectivity experienced by women in remote, rural and regional areas.

Further to these five immediate interventions, we note that the national alliance tasked with bringing together organisations to develop solutions, Australian Women Against Violence Alliance (AWAVA), has presented comprehensive advice on the major long-term reforms needed including the Blueprint for Reform for women on temporary visas experiencing violence, and that Women’s Legal Services Australia has mapped out the steps required for Safety First in Family Law. These solutions will require meaningful and sustained investment. AWAVA, its members and allies stand ready to work with governments to design and implement these reforms together.

This national crisis cannot be solved overnight. But actioning these five changes will bring immediate and substantial improvement to the safety of many women and children currently at risk, and will save lives. We urge you to do your part.

Signed,

 

  1. National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women’s Alliance
  2. Embolden (SA peak body of domestic, family and sexual violence services)
  3. Women’s Legal Services Queensland
  4. Women’s Legal Services Tasmania
  5. Ruby Gaea Darwin Centre Against Sexual Violence
  6. Sexual Assault Support Service Tasmania
  7. Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Women’s Legal Service North Queensland Inc.
  8. Emma House Domestic Violence Service
  9. Women’s Council for Domestic and Family Violence Services WA
  10. North Queensland Women’s Legal Service
  11. Equality Rights Alliance
  12. WESNET – The Women’s Services Network
  13. Annie North Inc
  14. Domestic Violence NSW
  15. Women’s Legal Service NSW
  16. economic Security4Women
  17. Limestone Coast Family Violence Action Group
  18. National Rural Women’s Coalition
  19. CASA Forum – Victorian Centres Against Sexual Assault
  20. Ending Violence Against Women Queensland
  21. Seras Women’s Shelter Inc.
  22. Mackay Women’s Services
  23. Association of Women Educators
  24. National Council of Single Mothers & their Children
  25. YWCA Canberra
  26. Women’s Safety NSW
  27. Mitcham Family Violence Education and Support Service
  28. Centre for Non-Violence
  29. Eastern Region Domestic Violence Services Network Inc. – Koolkuna
  30. Communicare Women’s Support Services
  31. Carnarvon Family Support Services
  32. WRISC Family Violence Support Inc.
  33. Women’s Centre Far North Queensland
  34. Migrant Women’s Support Program of Women’s Safety Services SA
  35. Lucy Saw Centre Association Inc.
  36. Penrith Women’s Health Centre
  37. Australasian Centre for Human Rights and Health
  38. Macleod Accommodation Support Service Inc.
  39. inTouch Multicultural Centre Against Family Violence
  40. North Shore Women’s Benevolent Association Limited
  41. Mid Coast Women’s Domestic Violence Court Advocacy Service
  42. safe steps Family Violence Response Centre
  43. Darwin Aboriginal & Islander Women’s Shelter
  44. Harmony Alliance: Migrant and Refugee Women for Change
  45. Accountability Matters Project
  46. DVConnect
  47. Domestic Violence Action Centre Toowoomba
  48. Gold Coast Domestic Violence Prevention Centre
  49. Domestic Violence Crisis Service Canberra
  50. Immigrant Women’s Support Service
  51. Sonshine Sanctuary Association
  52. Beryl Women Inc.
  53. Edon Place and Centre for Women & Co.
  54. Lou’s Place
  55. Cairns Regional Domestic Violence Service
  56. Women’s Information, Support and Housing in the North
  57. Settlement Services International
  58. Multicultural Centre for Women’s Health
  59. Northern Territory Council of Social Service
  60. Domestic Violence Victoria
  61. Project Respect
  62. Melaleuca Refugee Centre
  63. Dawn House Inc.
  64. Western Women’s Domestic Violence Court Advocacy Service
  65. Bramwell House (Salvation Army)
  66. Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria
  67. WASH House Inc.
  68. Immigrant Women’s Speakout Association Inc.
  69. Immigration Advice and Rights Centre
  70. Australian Women’s Health Network
  71. Centre Against Sexual Assault Central Victoria
  72. Open Support
  73. Women’s Legal Service (South Australia)
  74. Family Violence Prevention Legal Services National Forum
  75. Women’s Legal Services Australia
  76. No To Violence
  77. Take It Seriously
  78. YWCA Australia
  79. Refugee Advice & Casework Service (Aust) Inc.
  80. Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Australia
  81. Salvation Army National Family Violence Stream
  82. Economic Justice Australia
  83. Eastern Domestic Violence Service
  84. West Connect Domestic Violence Services

Women’s Safety Ministers sent 5 urgent actions for women’s safety

For immediate release |  AWAVA & Fair Agenda

5 March 2020

Ahead of the special meeting of Women’s Safety Ministers on Friday, domestic and family violence experts have today written to call for their governments to action five urgent and immediate changes to improve women’s safety.

The letter authored by Australian Violence Against Women Alliance and Fair Agenda (attached), has been signed by over 70 groups, who are all jointly backing five interventions they say can and must be locked in Friday, to provide immediate improvements to women’s and children’s safety:

  1. Fully funding the specialist services women and children rely on to be safe.
  2. Putting kids’ safety first in the family law system.
  3. Ensuring women and children facing major safety risks can be identified and referred correctly by frontline workers in health, social, family and community services.
  4. Improving AVO standards so that women and children can rely upon them for their safety, and perpetrators are held accountable for ongoing patterns of violence and abuse.
  5. Ensuring everyone’s calls for help can be heard.

“The murder of Hannah Clarke and her children has to be a turning point. The community is crying out for government action to put us on the path to a safer future. Experts have laid out the five specific changes governments must get started with this Friday.” said Renee Carr, Executive Director of Fair Agenda – a movement campaigning for women’s safety, economic security and agency.
“Women can’t afford for this meeting to only result in more plans and promises of future action. Alongside long-term plans, we need these five immediate changes to urgently improve women and children’s’ safety.” added Ms Carr.
“Governments can’t keep pointing to the text in the Fourth Action Plan as if that’s all that’s needed to make women safer. The plan isn’t worth the paper it’s written on if it’s not matched with adequate resourcing of services, and changes to the systems that perpetuate this crisis.” – said Dr Merrindahl Andrew, Program Manager AWAVA.

“With increasing awareness of the issue, and a public focus on changing attitudes, more women than ever before are seeking greater safety and support from services. Without full funding of the specialist services that women rely on to be safe, the current national action plan is set on a course to fail,” Dr Andrew said.

“Sadly, we know that men who are emotionally, physically and financially abusing their partners can also be a risk to their children. Right now the government’s Family Law Act operates to force a horrifying number of kids into care arrangements with parents who are violent and abusive – posing an immediate and ongoing risk to their safety and wellbeing. This needs to change immediately – courts should be putting kids’ safety first.” – added Angela Lynch, Women’s Legal Service Queensland.
“We keep hearing calls for innovative solutions to tackling domestic violence. Today the sector is renewing its call for sustainable resourcing for frontline services. These are the crucial services that make women and children safe. This for us would be real innovation” said Joanne Yates CEO Domestic Violence NSW.

Media contact: Dr Merrindahl Andrew, AWAVA, 0428 541 396 or Renee Carr, Fair Agenda, 0435 597 976
—

Background on the five action areas
1. Fully fund the services women rely on to be safe
The time a woman reaches out for help, or tries to escape her abuser, can be the most dangerous. Access to a specialist women’s service can be life saving.

We cannot leave women on their own to escape an abuser who is determined to stalk, track, harass, and intimidate her. The consequences are devastating.
Right now, funding decisions across state, territory and federal governments mean many services are forced to turn women in danger away. Specifically:

  • 150 women have to be turned away from specialist homelessness services every day – many of them women affected by domestic violence,
  •  170,000 people have to be turned away from legal assistance services every year – the kind of service women affected by domestic violence rely on to help them protect their children, to navigate the family law system, and to deal with financial abuse,
  • Services that intervene with men at risk of using violence to change their behaviour, have to turn away men who need their programs every week, and many have six month waiting lists,
  • Family Violence Prevention Legal Services report that 30-40% of the women contacting them have to be turned away because they don’t have the capacity to support them.

What’s more:

  • Family Violence Prevention Legal Services are still facing a funding cut to their National Forum – the only national voice for services working with First Nations women affected by family violence.
  • The WESNET-Telstra safe phones program, which has been independently found to be effective in keeping victims/survivors safe and connected as well as increasing frontline practitioners’ confidence in working with women experiencing technology abuse, is fighting federal Government cuts.

2. Put kids’ safety first
Children can be at great danger from a parent who is using domestic and family violence, and being exposed to such abusive and violent behaviour can be profoundly damaging to their wellbeing and development.
An estimated 70% of matters in family court involve family violence and abuse. Yet the starting point for decisions about parenting arrangements under the current legislation is a presumption of shared parental responsibility. This emphasis on the child having a “meaningful relationship” with both parents is so strong that it operates in practice to force large numbers of children into care arrangements with parents who are violent and abusive. This leads to ongoing damage to the child’s wellbeing, and often forces the other parent to maintain contact with a perpetrator who is using abusive behaviour and causing them harm.

The Federal Government needs to remove the emphasis on shared parenting in the Family Law Act to enable courts to put children’s safety first when making orders about where they live and with whom they spend time.

3. Identify women and children at immediate risk
Strangulation, sexual assault and coercive behaviours (including through technology), are part of an escalating pattern of abuse, and can be a sign that a woman’s life is at imminent risk.
Wherever a woman is reaching out for help – whether at a community legal centre, police station, court, hospital, GP or pregnancy check up – we need that service to be able to identify when her safety is at immediate risk, and to refer her to an expert service best placed to assist her to be safe.
We also need to train those working with people who display signs of abusive and violent behaviour to identify what level of intervention is needed, and to engage the relevant accredited behaviour change or perpetrator intervention services, so we can reduce the abuse and violence women and children are facing.
4. Improve AVO standards to hold perpetrators accountable and interrupt their escalating violence
People experiencing violence should be able to rely on our civil and criminal justice system for their protection. For women and children subjected to domestic and family violence, the main mechanism for their protection is an apprehended violence order (AVO).
Under the current system, all too often those orders are not enforced, or include requirements that don’t account for the dynamics and patterns of abuse being used, and can make it harder for a woman to manage her children’s and her own safety.
We need all parts of the AVO system to adhere to higher standards in recognising escalating violence and holding perpetrators accountable.
Achieving those higher standards will require police and judiciary to improve their understanding of the presentation, patterns and impacts of domestic and family violence. Such specialisation is important because without adequate understanding, police and courts can inadvertently mistake the victim as the primary aggressor; undermining victim/survivors’ trust in the system, and its ability to help them when they need it most.

We need a consistent and appropriate response from police and the courts, including collection of all relevant evidence, and making orders on behalf of victim-survivors where relevant, and where orders are breached ensuring sanctions are appropriate and consistent.

5. Ensure everyone’s call for help can be heard

We need to ensure that regardless of her disability, cultural or language background, or geographical location, any woman reaching out for help to escape abuse and violence is able to access the assistance she needs.

Disclosing abuse and asking for help is hard enough, without having to figure out how to translate what you’re going through into your second or third language. Translation and interpreting services can make all the difference for a person who is still learning English, or whose hearing or speech impairment makes it hard to communicate.

 

See here for the full text of the letter and the most up to date signatories.

Understanding violence against women in today’s world – reflections on the Bangkok Regional Civil Society Forum for the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action 25 year review

 

Photo by Merrindahl Andrew

 

 

The year 2020 will mark the 25th anniversary of the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform of Action (1995), which affirmed that gender equality is a human right and a condition for social justice. From 24 to 26 November 2019 a Beijing+25 civil society forum for the Asia-Pacific region was held in Bangkok, Thailand. The Forum was organised for civil society actors to celebrate achievements, identify concerns, and facilitate intergenerational dialogue and solidarity between constituencies represented. The widespread and complex nature of violence of gender-based violence was discussed with attendees working in civil society attending from various countries at the Forum.

 

AWAVA’s Program Manager, Dr Merrindahl Andrew, attended the Forum and this article reflects on the discussions there. The article is co-authored by former AWAVA Administration and Communications Assistant Sumithri Venketasubramanian together with Merrindahl, drawing on her notes from the Forum. It is not able to fully encapsulate the breadth and richness of all the discussions that occurred in the Forum, as facilitated by feminists and women’s rights activists from across the region.

 

Speakers at the Forum articulated how the struggle for women’s rights, gender equality and human rights has achieved some gains in the 25 years since the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. The passing of laws to protect the rights of women lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer (LGBTIQ+) people, a strong and organised feminist and women’s movement, and growing inclusiveness of feminist movements as well as stronger linkages between women’s rights and feminist movements and other social justice movements were some of the examples raised.

 

But all these positive changes have not been sufficient to end violence against women and girls. At the Forum, this violence was identified as a major continuing issue worldwide. Rather than being concentrated in certain areas, women in diverse societies all over the world are subjected to violence. Gender-based violence may be experienced in any part of life: at home, at work, in institutional settings, in public and/or online. The way that violence is used, as well as the way women respond, are shaped by interconnected global and local forces. This blog post explores some of the themes that underpin and contribute to gender-based violence at a global scale, drawing from points raised at the Forum.

 

Self-determination

 

The Forum touched on self-determination as a key area that still needs progress in order to achieve women’s rights and safety. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) highlights self-determination as a fundamental human right, meaning that Indigenous peoples have the right to “freely determine their political status and economic, social, and cultural development”. This right continues to be violated by colonial nation-states, with impacts contributing to high rates of violence against Indigenous women. This is the case in Australia as in many other countries. but Indigenous Elders and human rights activists maintain their demand for self-determination.

 

Globalisation and economics

 

Presentations at the Forum highlighted how the disadvantaged economic situation of women, such as lacking financial security and access to supports and services, is a key factor that underpins and perpetuates gender-based violence.

 

Today’s economies are mostly focused on growing and harnessing capital and, at an individual level, on one’s ability to perform economically productive work. However, what counts as economically productive work – that individuals are paid for – is very gendered, with some forms of work not recognised for what they are. These unpaid roles contribute to women average earning less than men. The resulting financial dependence is a form of a power imbalance, due to the centrality of money in economies internationally. This dynamic can be exploited in the use of violence, taking control and autonomy away from women.

 

The Forum also highlighted that many people are participating in what is known as the “informal” economy. Informal activities are not taxed or monitored by the government, meaning that they are difficult to regulate. (They are not necessarily activities that are against the law, they may just operate outside of formal institutions.) Women are more represented in the informal economy, so they may have less access to supports and workplace protections than people in formal sectors. Barriers to information and accessing services are also faced by women in rural areas and with limited access to the internet. The autonomy and livelihoods of women are often severely impacted by corporations and economic forces. Global institutions such as international trade agreements are not only facilitating these negative impacts but in some cases requiring governments to suppress women’s protests against them. On the converse, just a tiny percentage of development funding meant to be for women’s empowerment is going to women’s rights organisations.

 

Rights for whom?

 

Presentations at the forum noted how, in economies that value maximising capital, people are expected to be “productive members of society”. The opportunities and access to employment, however, are not equal for everyone. Societal prejudice where rigid, binary gender norms underpin violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ+) people may be present in workplaces that are unsafe, and that creates a barrier to financial security. Participants noted there is a lack of data on transgender women experiencing violence specifically, meaning that the experiences of this significant group of women are not properly documented or addressed.

 

Inaccessible workplaces limit opportunities for women with disabilities, with presentations showing how this further entrenches unequal power dynamics and dependence upon family members, partners, carers and/or medical professionals. Dependence is expected of people with disability, and so not enough focus is given to making rights and agency accessible through obtaining information and accessing legal processes. The experience of living with a disability is often de-gendered, meaning that the specific experiences of women with disability are not considered through the lens of gender.

 

Sessions explored how the relationship between bodily autonomy, mental health, disability, and gender is complex. For example, LGBTIQ+ people may be subject to stigma on the basis of their gender identity, sexual orientation, sex or intersex status, and perhaps perceived to be mentally ill. As a result, they may be subject to non-consensual procedures and violence in order to change them to meet what is expected of them socially or in religion. This includes harmful medical procedures on intersex people with the goal to ‘normalise their bodies to fit a rigid male/female binary. The sexual and reproductive rights of women with disability are often not respected, and asserting sexuality and agency is a part of asserting their human rights. Women with disabilities may have their autonomy to make choices taken away through forced sterilisation, abortion and contraception.

 

Migration and the role of governments

 

While state sovereignty is a fundamental principle in international law, in a world where more people are moving across nation borders than ever the Forum considered the gaps that exist for women experiencing violence in the context of this movement. People’s movements across borders may be voluntary or forced, or may represent choices made between limited options. There is no one story or narrative that can explain migration and forced displacement; it can be empowering and/or disempowering – even for the same person. There is a lack of recognition about how migrant experiences are shaped by gender, such as mental health issues arising from gender- and ethnicity-based discrimination and violence in the workplace. Violence itself may be a reason for women to leave their home countries; however there are gaps in policies and laws that recognise gender-based violence to be justification for seeking asylum, as well as a lack of recognition of the experiences of LGBTIQ+ people in migration, asylum seeking and family reunion.

 

The Forum noted how changes in economic activity, such as the mechanisation of agricultural work, can lead to women being forced to move elsewhere to find work and sustain livelihoods. Union activities may be undermined by corporations, and where trade unions are present, they may be patriarchal and hostile to women and migrant workers.

 

Threats against human rights defenders (especially women and LGBTIQ+ people) by governments and the active persecution and suppression of civil society undermine the important work being done by women activists and advocates in countries all over the world. Governments ought to be held to account, but speakers at the Forum noted that the current international regime means that non-violent intervention to resist domestic human rights violations is close to impossible in many places. Perpetrators of violence who are in another country to a victim/survivor are not brought to justice as a result of this, and governments may not take responsibility and action for violence committed by their citizens in other countries.

 

Climate crisis

 

Presentations to the Forum highlighted that, on a global scale, communities that have contributed the least to the acceleration of climate change are bearing the brunt of the negative impacts. This difference is largely class-based, both comparing rich and poor countries, and comparing communities within nation-state borders. The inequalities, challenges and factors leading to gender-based violence are further exacerbated by other stressors. Natural disasters, whose frequency and scale are becoming more extreme and unpredictable with climate change, introducing additional stressors that may contribute to the use of violence. Existing gendered power gaps within families and relationships are widened. Women, who are represented more greatly in the agricultural sector than men in many countries, have their livelihoods threatened and may face displacement as a result.

 

Opportunities

 

The global crisis of gender-based violence is grave and urgent, and the Forum heard about opportunities for strengthening efforts and movements to address it. There are international processes and instruments that are meant to support the work being done by civil society organisations and activists, such as the General Resolution 35 (GR35) of the Convention to End all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW),which outlines steps for protection of victims/survivors, prevention, accountability for perpetrators and coordination of responses. The Istanbul Convention can be further used to promote the GR35, serving as a clear roadmap for states, and a means to hold governments to account.

 

Creating new research, data and evidence can serve to not only understand the extent and complexity of gender-based violence, but also to highlight the urgency of addressing it. It is important that research is connected right down to the grassroots level, rather than as a top-down project that is distant from the work being done on the ground. Presentations to the Forum noted that when documenting the situations of people, researchers must understand the specific oppressions that they are facing as a precondition. Participants highlighted the need for actions at all levels and scales, and expanding common ground across parts of the movement as opposed to focusing on the differences between strategies.

 

Continuing activism in all settings is needed to send a strong message from the public about dissatisfaction with the current state of gender-based violence and violence against women. The Forum heard about the upcoming Women’s Global Strike on 8 March 2020 as an opportunity for advocates of gender equality all over the world to make a stand, demanding to their governments and governments around the world that ending gender-based violence is a top priority, and we will not stop until justice and safety are achieved.

 

 

Suggestions for further reading

 

Australia’s country statement to the Intergovernmental meeting: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Australia%20%28B%2B25%29%20Item%202.pdf

Civil society statement to the Intergovernmental Meeting drawing on discussions at the Civil Society Forum:

 

Outcome document from the Intergovernmental meeting:
https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Draft%20Outcome.pdf

 

Civil society responses and further analysis:https://apwld.org/press-release-women-and-gender-rights-activists-deeply-disappointed-with-regional-outcome-on-human-rights/

 

Davis, M., 2012. Aboriginal Women: The Right to Self-Determination. Delivered at Murrup Barak, Melbourne Institute for Indigenous Development, University of Melbourne. 8 November 2012. Accessed at: https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUIndigLawRw/2012/6.pdf

 

Griffin, P., 2010. Gender, governance and the global political economy. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 64(1): 86-104.

 

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, 2018. The Responsibility to Prevent and Respond to Sexual and Gender-based Violence in Disasters and Crises. 24 July 2018. Kuala Lumpur/Geneva. Accessed at:
https://media.ifrc.org/ifrc/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/07/17072018-SGBV-Report_Final.pdf.pdf

 

Kuokkanen, R., 2012. Violence Against Women, Indigenous Self-Determination and Autonomy in Sami Society. L’Image du Sápmi 2. Ed. K. Anderson, pp. 436-452. Örebro University Press, 2013. Accessed at: https://rauna.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2012-violence-against-women-self-determination-and-autonomy-in-sami-society.pdf

 

United Nations, 2007. UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 13 September 2007. Accessed at: https://www.humanrights.gov.au/our-work/un-declaration-rights-indigenous-peoples-1

 

Women with Disabilities Australia, 2017. Submission to the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Study on the Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights of Girls with Disabilities. 19 May 2017. Accessed at:
http://wwda.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/WWDA_SR_Disability_SRHR_May2017.pdf

 

Submission on the Review of Online Safety Laws

AWAVA welcomes a public consultation on new online safety laws and a move to harmonise the legislation
in order to better respond to abuse perpetrated online. Overall we are supportive of the proposed
legislative changes. As the National Women’s Alliances tasked with providing input on policy aiming to
prevent and respond to different manifestations of violence against women, in this submission we are
highlighting the need to embed an intersectional gender lens to social policy and legislation on online
safety.

Download our submission here

 

Civil Society Report for the Beijing +25 Review

Working Together for Equality: NGO Beijing +25 Review has been developed by a caucus of Australian civil society organisations to evaluate the progress of the implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action by Australia. AWAVA has been an active member of the caucus, drafted a section on violence against women and contributed to a number of other  sections throughout the report.

Download the report here:

Go to Top