ParentsNextThe House of Representatives Select Committee on Workforce Australia Employment Services has released Your Future Planning: Interim Report on ParentsNext. AWAVA has strongly supported the positions advocated by the National Council of Single Mothers and their Children (NCSMC), and endorsed their submission. While AWAVA has a range of concerns with ParentsNext and its implementation, and the impact it has on the wellbeing of women and children generally, we are specifically concerned regarding the program’s treatment of victim-survivors of domestic and family violence. While employment participation can be a pathway away from violence, employment services do not specialise in treating trauma and do not have the specialist knowledge required to support women and children escaping violence. Forced interactions of this nature can, on the other hand, re-traumatise and compromise the safety of victim-survivors. Pleasingly the report recommends: - A clear principle that parents have a right to choose to actively parent their babies and very young children and that caring for young children is work which should be valued in its own right.
- Participation in employment programs should be entirely voluntary when a parent's youngest child is under three.
- A new concept of a 'Skills Passport' that has cash incentives.
These are good things but one major issue remains. NCSMC are deeply concerned about the continuation of ParentsNext until July 2024 with the opportunity for a 'short' extension, with this long lead-in potentially enabling the committee's recommendations and intent to be modified and weakened. They are calling for women with children under three years to be granted immediate exiting options, and for the Targeted Compliance Framework to be suspended. As Terese Edwards, CEO of NCSMC noted, “For women who are single mothering, responding to trauma and managing co-parenting which can be difficult and unsafe, it will remain problematic irrespective of the enhanced safety mechanisms”. AWAVA believes strongly that the safety of women and children must be prioritised, particularly in light of the Australian government’s endorsement of the National Plan to End Violence Against Women and Children. The Commonwealth Ombudsman has also warned that Australia’s mutual obligation system for welfare risks “subjecting disadvantaged participants to unreasonably onerous and punitive conditions”, noting for example that First Nations parents incurred a higher rate (33%) of payment suspensions than their proportion of the ParentsNext caseload (18%). |